non-profit organization, collaborative strategies, advocacy planning, transportation planning
Current planning, whether it is guided by an issue or by proximity, lacks a common vision.
Garrett, Mark, and Brian Taylor.1999. Reconsidering Social Equity in Public Transit. Berkeley Planning Journal13.
Krumholz, Norman and John Forestor. 1990. Making Equity Planning Work. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Print.
Pastor, Manuel. Regions that work: How Cities and Suburbs Can Grow Together
Swanstrom, Todd and Brian Banks. 2007. Possibilities for Progressive Regionalism: Federal Transportation Policy and Local Hiring Agreement. Berkeley, Calif.: Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California at Berkeley.
Weiss, Marc, The Rise of the Community Builders. New York: Columbia University Press (1987).
“Megaregions: Literature Review of the Implications for U.S. Infrastructure Investment and Transportation Planning. Section III. Foundations and Methods of Delineation: C. Defining a Region.” U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration. 23 Feb 2011. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/planning/megaregions4.htm
Coalition for a Livable Future, Equity Atlas. http://www.equityatlas.com
Tom Rickert (1998 and 2002), Mobility for All; Accessible Transportation Around the World, and Making Access Happen: Promoting and Planning Transport For All, Access Exchange International (http://www.globalride-sf.org), and the Swedish Institute On Independent Living (http://www.independentliving.org).
Glenn Robinson, et al. (2010), Building on the Strength of Environmental Justice in Transportation: Environmental Justice and Transportation Toolkit, Baltimore Region Environmental Justice in Transportation Project (http://www.ejkit.com) and the Office of Civil Rights, Federal Transit Administration.
Caroline Rodier, John E. Abraham, Brenda N. Dix and John D.Hunt (2010), Equity Analysis of Land Use and Transport Plans Using an Integrated Spatial Model, Report 09-08, Mineta Transportation Institute (http://www.transweb.sjsu.edu); at http://www.transweb.sjsu.edu/MTIportal/research/publications/documents/Equity%20Analysis%20of%20Land%20Use%20(with%20Covers).pdf.
UTTIPEC (2009), Pedestrian Design Guidelines: Don’t Drive…Walk, Delhi Development Authority, New Delhi (http://www.uttipec.nic.in); at http://www.uttipec.nic.in/PedestrianGuidelines-30Nov09-UTTPEC-DDA.pdf.
The San Diego Regional Transportation Plan for 2050 is currently being updated by San Diego Association of Governments and is creating the very first Sustainable Communities Strategy. Sustainable San Diego Coalition is a collaborative organization bringing advocacy organizations together to develop regional planning messages to provide input. The Coalition is currently in the process of formalizing its structure to be in a better position to support the organizations of San Diego. This paper identifies the social and political process involved. It is believed that collaborative planning is most effective in ensuring equitable distribution of transportation funding. However, through data collection from case studies, planning documents, Sustainable San Diego Coalition meetings and SANDAG meetings this study shows SANDAG and the coalition have differing visions for the future transportation plans currently being proposed for a number of reasons which include they define the needs for the region using different methodological monitoring, and they have differing agendas. This paper argues that the processes and structures involved in the case studies constitute an ideal model for future efforts in collaborative planning for the San Diego Region.
The San Diego Regional Transportation Plan for 2050 is currently being updated by San Diego Association of Governments and is creating the very first Sustainable Communities Strategy. Sustainable San Diego Coalition is a collaborative organization bringing advocacy organizations together to develop regional planning messages to provide input. The Coalition is currently in the process of formalizing its structure to be in a better position to support the organizations of San Diego. This paper identifies the social and political process involved. It is believed that collaborative planning is most effective in ensuring equitable distribution of transportation funding. However, through data collection from case studies, planning documents, Sustainable San Diego Coalition meetings and SANDAG meetings this study shows SANDAG and the coalition have differing visions for the future transportation plans currently being proposed for a number of reasons which include they define the needs for the region using different methodological monitoring, and they have differing agendas. This paper argues that the processes and structures involved in the case studies constitute an ideal model for future efforts in collaborative planning for the San Diego Region.
Copyright © 2009 USP Student Research all rights reserved
Site Designed By Digital Mud Studio